Missouri Court of Appeals, 2013

Stebe v. Guru Unlimited, LLC

Stebe v. Guru Unlimited, LLC
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided October 22, 2013 · Hoff, Odenwald, Quigless
413 S.W.3d 20; 2013 WL 5744510; 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 1241 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Stebe v. Guru Unlimited, LLC

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The Guru Unlimited, LLC (“Appellant”) appeals from the judgment of the trial court in favor of Robert Stebe and Deborah Salivar-Keene (“Respondents”) *21denying Appellant’s motion to set aside a default judgment entered against it. Appellant argues the trial court abused its discretion in denying its motion because the motion satisfied the pleading requirements of Rule 74.05.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claim of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b)(5).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.