Smith v. State
Smith v. State
413 S.W.3d 388; 2013 WL 5988953; 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 1337
(South Western Reporter, Third Series)
Smith v. State
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The movant, Julius Smith, appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal and find no clear error. Rule 29.15(k). An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.
The motion court’s order denying the movant’s Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b)(2).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.