Missouri Court of Appeals, 2013

Swims v. State

Swims v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided November 19, 2013 · Dowd, Mooney, Sullivan
413 S.W.3d 733; 2013 WL 6092519; 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 1374 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Swims v. State

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Joe C. Swims, III appeals from the motion court’s Judgment denying, without an evidentiary hearing, his amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Judgment and Sentence filed pursuant to Rule 24.035.1 We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the judgment of the motion court is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

. All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2011.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.