Missouri Court of Appeals, 2013

Gillispie v. State

Gillispie v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided November 19, 2013 · Dowd, Mooney, Sullivan
414 S.W.3d 52; 2013 WL 6095550; 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 1377 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Gillispie v. State

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Artoska Gillispie appeals the motion court’s denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. An opinion would have no precedential value. We have furnished the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b)(2) & (5).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.