Missouri Court of Appeals, 2013

State v. Hilliard

Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided September 24, 2013 · Dowd, Mooney, Sullivan

414 S.W.3d 576; 2013 WL 5379664; 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 1106 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Hilliard v. State (Mo. Ct. App. 2018)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Gregory Hilliard (“Defendant”) appeals from the judgment upon his conviction by a jury of one count of first-degree statutory rape, Section 566.032, RSMo Cum.Supp. 2006.1 Defendant argues the trial court erred: (1) in sustaining the State’s objection to the admission of Defendant’s Exhibit A; and (2) in overruling defense counsel’s objection to investigator Karen *577Crocker’s testimony about the means through which trichomonas vaginalis is transmitted.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the trial court did not err plainly err or abuse its discretion. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

. All further statutory references are to RSMo Cum.Supp.2006.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.