Missouri Court of Appeals, 2013

Ford v. State

Ford v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided November 26, 2013 · Amburg, Cohen, Gaertner
415 S.W.3d 138; 2013 WL 6236720; 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 1414 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Ford v. State

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Hubert Ford appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 29.151 motion. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the motion court’s denial of post-conviction relief was not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties, for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Mo. R. Civ. P. 84.16(b).

. All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2013, unless otherwise indicated.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.