State v. Liston
State v. Liston
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Jamaal Liston (“Defendant”) appeals from the judgment upon his conviction by a jury of one count of second-degree burglary, Section 569.170, RSMo 2000,
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the trial court did not err, plainly or otherwise. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).
. All further statutory references are to RSMo 2000.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.