Missouri Court of Appeals, 2013

State v. Hickerson

State v. Hickerson
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided October 22, 2013 · Dowd, Mooney, Sullivan
418 S.W.3d 480; 2013 WL 5744507; 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 1237 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

State v. Hickerson

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Eric B. Hickerson appeals from the trial court’s judgment denying his Motion for Post-Conviction DNA Testing without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. State v. Ruff, 256 S.W.3d 55, 56 (Mo.banc 2008). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our *481decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.