Missouri Court of Appeals, 2013

Lane v. Lane-Jordan

Lane v. Lane-Jordan
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided November 26, 2013 · Amburg, Clayton, Gaertner, III
419 S.W.3d 882; 2013 WL 6236710; 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 1408 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Lane v. Lane-Jordan

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Georgetown Mortgage Profit Sharing Trust appeals the trial court’s judgment, entered upon a jury verdict in favor of Susan Lane for wrongful foreclosure. Lane cross-appeals, contending the trial *883court erred in refusing to award her prejudgment interest.

The evidence sufficiently supports the jury’s verdict. No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.