Missouri Court of Appeals, 2013

Sapienza v. State

Sapienza v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided March 26, 2013 · Ahrens, Norton, Sullivan
436 S.W.3d 237; 2013 WL 1209958; 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 367 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Sapienza v. State

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Sean Sapienza appeals from a Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.