Missouri Court of Appeals, 2014

King v. Lindell Bank & Trust Co.

King v. Lindell Bank & Trust Co.
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided February 11, 2014 · Dowd, Mooney, Sullivan
422 S.W.3d 535; 2014 WL 537836; 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 142 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

King v. Lindell Bank & Trust Co.

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Sandra King (Appellant) appeals from the trial court’s judgment granting Lindell Bank & Trust Company’s (Respondent) motion for summary judgment on Count III of Appellant’s petition alleging conversion against Respondent and permitting Respondent to file amended admission responses. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that Respondent was entitled to judgment as a matter of law on Appellant’s conversion claim and the trial court did not abuse its discretion in allowing Respondent to file late supplemental responses to Appellant’s request for admissions. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.