Missouri Court of Appeals, 2014

State v. Hulsey

Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided March 11, 2014 · Hoff, Odenwald, Quigless

424 S.W.3d 464; 2014 WL 931052; 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 280 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

Hulsey v. Ramey (District Court, E.D. Missouri 2021)
Hulsey v. State (Mo. Ct. App. 2017)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Demetrius Hulsey (Defendant) appeals the judgment of conviction entered by the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis after a jury found him guilty of two counts of first-degree robbery. Defendant claims the trial court erred by denying his motion to suppress and admitting into evidence *465his statements to police because the statements were obtained in violation of his privilege against compulsory self-incrimination.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. We have, however, prepared a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 80.25(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.