Missouri Court of Appeals, 2014

Burston v. State

Burston v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided March 18, 2014 · Amburg, Cohen, Hess
424 S.W.3d 483; 2014 WL 1016937; 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 303 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Burston v. State

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Ronald Burston (Movant) appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. In his sole point on appeal, Movant asserts that counsel rendered ineffective assistance by fail*484ing to inform Movant of a four-year sentence plea offer. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the motion court did not clearly err in denying post-conviction relief. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.