Missouri Court of Appeals, 2014

Costello v. State

Costello v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided March 18, 2014 · Dowd, Mooney, Sullivan
424 S.W.3d 484; 2014 WL 1016947; 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 310 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Costello v. State

Opinion of the Court

*485 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Keith Costello, II appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 29.151 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k); Johnson v. State, 406 S.W.3d 892, 898 (Mo. banc 2013). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

. All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2011, unless otherwise indicated.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.