Missouri Court of Appeals, 2014

Robinson v. State

Robinson v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided April 8, 2014 · Hoff, Odenwald, Quigless
427 S.W.3d 891; 2014 WL 1379757; 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 387 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Robinson v. State

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jackie Robinson appeals from the motion court’s “Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, Order and Judgment” denying his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 24.035 following an evidentiary hearing where he alleged ineffective assistance of plea counsel. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claim of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.