State v. Lane
State v. Lane
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Ricky Edward Lane, Jr., appeals from the judgment and sentence imposed after a jury found him guilty of two counts of first-degree robbery, in violation of Section 569.020, RSMo 2000,
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).
. All statutory references are to RSMo 2000, as amended.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.