Missouri Court of Appeals, 2014

Rowell v. State

Rowell v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided May 6, 2014 · Dowd, Mooney, Sullivan
430 S.W.3d 334; 2014 WL 1847903; 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 516 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Rowell v. State

Opinion of the Court

*335ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The movant, Mario Rowell, appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for postcon-viction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal and find no clear error. Rule 29.15(k). An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.

We affirm the motion court’s judgment denying the movant’s Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. Rule 84.16(b)(2).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.