Missouri Court of Appeals, 2014

Bonds v. State

Bonds v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided May 6, 2014 · Dowd, Mooney, Sullivan
430 S.W.3d 337; 2014 WL 1848457; 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 519 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Bonds v. State

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Earl Bonds appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 29.151 *338motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k); Johnson v. State, 406 S.W.3d 892, 898 (Mo. banc 2013). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b). PER CURIAM.

. All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P. 2010, unless otherwise indicated.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.