Missouri Court of Appeals, 2014

State v. McCarty

State v. McCarty
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided May 20, 2014 · Gaertner, Richter, Russell
431 S.W.3d 538; 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 573; 2014 WL 2106738 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

State v. McCarty

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Following a bench trial, Eric McCarty (“Defendant”) now appeals from the trial court’s judgment finding Defendant guilty of fraudulently stopping payment on an instrument, in violation of Section 570.125. *539We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.