Missouri Court of Appeals, 2014

David v. State

David v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided June 10, 2014 · Dowd, Mooney, Sullivan
433 S.W.3d 492; 2014 WL 2587118; 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 657 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

David v. State

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Sheila David appeals from the motion court’s judgment, following an evidentiary hearing, denying her amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Judgment *493and Sentence filed pursuant to Rule 24.035.1 We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b). PER CURIAM.

. All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2012, unless otherwise indicated.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.