Missouri Court of Appeals, 2014

Black v. State

Black v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided August 26, 2014 · Hess, Hoff, Sullivan
439 S.W.3d 298; 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 914; 2014 WL 4198043 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Black v. State

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

James R. Black (Movant) appeals from the motion court’s Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law (judgment) on Mov-ant’s Amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Judgment and Sentence denying Movant’s Rule 29.15 claims for post-conviction relief. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential or precedential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.