Missouri Court of Appeals, 2014

Brown v. City of Cottleville

Brown v. City of Cottleville
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided June 24, 2014 · Amburg, Cohen, Richter
442 S.W.3d 138; 2014 WL 2883504; 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 702 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Brown v. City of Cottleville

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Employer City of Cottleville, Missouri, (“Cottleville”) appeals the order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (“Commission”) determining that employee *139Chad Brown is eligible for unemployment benefits. The Commission rejected Cot-tleville’s claim that Brown was terminated for misconduct connected to work. We affirm the Commission’s order.

No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.