Sneed v. State
Sneed v. State
443 S.W.3d 729; 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 1082; 2014 WL 4832316
(South Western Reporter, Third Series)
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Bradley Sneed (“Movant”) appeals from the judgment of the motion court that denied his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to, Rule 29.15 without an eviden-tiary hearing.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.