Missouri Court of Appeals, 2014

Sneed v. State

Sneed v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided September 30, 2014 · Ahrens, Mooney, Norton
443 S.W.3d 729; 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 1082; 2014 WL 4832316 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Sneed v. State

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Bradley Sneed (“Movant”) appeals from the judgment of the motion court that denied his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to, Rule 29.15 without an eviden-tiary hearing.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.