Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Missouri Court of Appeals, 2014

Taylor v. State

Taylor v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided October 14, 2014 · Dowd, Gaertner, Odenwald
445 S.W.3d 679; 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 1140; 2014 WL 5139415 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Taylor v. State

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Eric D. Taylor appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.0351 motion. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the motion court’s denial of post-conviction relief was not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties, for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Mo. R. Civ. P. 84.16(b).

. All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2013, unless otherwise indicated.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑