Missouri Court of Appeals, 2014

Faulkner v. Rasnic

Faulkner v. Rasnic
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided November 25, 2014 · Cohen, III, Richter
448 S.W.3d 873; 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 1318; 2014 WL 6682513 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Faulkner v. Rasnic

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Plaintiff/Appellant Todd Faulkner sought damages for personal injuries allegedly caused by the negligence of Defendant Matthew Roddy (“Roddy”) and Defendant/Respondent Craig Rasnic (“Rasnic”). We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.