Missouri Court of Appeals, 2014

Stewart v. Southwestern Bell Telephone

Stewart v. Southwestern Bell Telephone
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided November 25, 2014 · Amburg, Cohen, Quigless
451 S.W.3d 300; 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 1314; 2014 WL 6682340 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Stewart v. Southwestern Bell Telephone

Opinion of the Court

*301 ORDER

PER CURIAM

Employee Antoinne Stewart appeals the order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (“Commission”) determining that he is ineligible for employment benefits. We affirm the Commission’s order.

No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.