Missouri Court of Appeals, 2014

Washam v. Hartsfield

Washam v. Hartsfield
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided November 18, 2014 · Ellis, Howard, Pfeiffer
456 S.W.3d 434; 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 1287; 2014 WL 6463320 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Washam v. Hartsfield

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Appellant Kenneth Washam appeals pro se from a judgment entered by the Circuit Court of Jackson County in favor of Respondents Amy and Wallace Hartsfield. The circuit court entered the judgment following a trial de novo on a small claims property dispute between Appellant and Respondents. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and that no error of law appears. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a *435formal written opinion; however, a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.