ORDER

B.T. appeals a judgment terminating his parental rights to his son, P.T., and his daughter, S.T. Because the trial court did not err in finding that clear and convincing evidence established a statutory ground for terminating B.T.’s parental rights, and did not err in finding by a preponderance of the evidence that termination of B.T.’s parental rights was in the best interests of P.T. ánd S.T., we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).