Missouri Court of Appeals, 2015

Thomas v. State

Thomas v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided February 3, 2015 · Hess, Hoff, Sullivan
453 S.W.3d 863; 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 98; 2015 WL 427970 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Thomas v. State

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Eugene Thomas appeals from the motion court’s Conclusions of Law and Order on his Amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Judgment and Sentence and Request for Evidentiary Hearing denying his Rule 29.15 claims for post-conviction relief. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential or precedential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.