Missouri Court of Appeals, 2015

Cotton v. State

Cotton v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided March 10, 2015 · Hess, Hoff, Sullivan
457 S.W.3d 381; 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 243; 2015 WL 1119412 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Cotton v. State

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Tatizes Cotton appeals from the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. . We have reviewed the briefs of the'parties and the record on appeal and conclude the motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Brooks v. State, 242 S.W.3d 705, 708 (Mo.banc 2008). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.