Dare v. State
Dare v. State
458 S.W.3d 462; 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 290; 2015 WL 1246265
(South Western Reporter, Third Series)
Dare v. State
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Michael Dare appeals the motion court’s denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for postcon-viction relief. An opinion would have no precedential value. We have furnished the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b)(2).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.