Clay v. State
Clay v. State
461 S.W.3d 453; 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 548; 2015 WL 2391929
(South Western Reporter, Third Series)
Clay v. State
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Mr. Timothy Clay, Jr., appeals the denial of a 29.15 post-conviction relief motion. He claims trial counsel was ineffective for failing to investigate and call the codefen-dant to corroborate a self-defense theory. He also claims appellate counsel was ineffective for failing to file surveillance video exhibits to support the insufficiency of evidence argument. We affirm.
For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.