Missouri Court of Appeals, 2015

Saller v. State

Saller v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided May 12, 2015 · Hess, Hóff, Mary, Sullivan
461 S.W.3d 849; 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 516; 2015 WL 2227696 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Saller v. State

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Trevor K. Sailer (Movant) appeals from the motion court’s Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Judgment (judgment) on Movant’s Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct the Judgment and Sentence denying Movant’s Rule 24.035 claims for post-conviction relief (PCR Motion) following an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential or precedential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum *850opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.