Missouri Court of Appeals, 2015

Cordell v. State

Cordell v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided June 9, 2015 · Hess, Hoff, Sullivan
463 S.W.3d 467; 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 613; 2015 WL 3610537 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Cordell v. State

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Larry Cordell appeals from the motion court’s Judgment denying, without an evi-dentiary hearing, his amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Judgment and Sentence filed pursuant to Rule 24.035.1 We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the judgment of the motion court is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use *468only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

. Mo. R. Crim. P. 2013.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.