Martin v. State
Martin v. State
464 S.W.3d 280; 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 703; 2015 WL 3972371
(South Western Reporter, Third Series)
Martin v. State
Opinion of the Court
Mr. Phillip D. Martin appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 post-conviction relief motion. He claims' that he was forced to plead guilty to the charged offenses because defense counsel failed to prepare for trial.
For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.