Missouri Court of Appeals, 2015

Moorehead v. State

Moorehead v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided September 1, 2015 · Dowd, Hoff, Richter
468 S.W.3d 476; 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 869; 2015 WL 5134555 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Moorehead v. State

Opinion of the Court

*477 ORDER

PER CURIAM

Gregory Moorehead (Movant) appeals from the motion court’s Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law on Movant’s Amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Judgment and Sentence denying Movant’s Rule 29.15 claims for post-conviction relief. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential or precedential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.