Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Missouri Court of Appeals, 2015

Houston v. State

Houston v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided September 8, 2015 · Gaertner, Hess, Quigless
469 S.W.3d 503; 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 894; 2015 WL 5239746 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Houston v. State

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Damon Houston appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 29.151 motion. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the motion court’s denial of post-conviction relief was not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties, for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b) (2015).

. All rule references are to Mo. R. Crim. P. (2015), unless otherwise indicated.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑