Missouri Court of Appeals, 2015

Cockrell v. State

Cockrell v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided October 6, 2015 · Gaertner, Hess, Quigless
471 S.W.3d 786; 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1013; 2015 WL 5823383 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Cockrell v. State

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Duron Cockrell (Movant) appeals the motion court’s denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. Movant claims trial counsel was ineffective for adducing and failing to object to evidence about Mov-ant’s prior bad acts. We affirm.

*787We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find that the motion court did not clearly err in denying post-conviction relief. Ah éxtend-ed opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.