Missouri Court of Appeals, 2015

McAllister v. State

McAllister v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided August 25, 2015 · Cohen, Odenwald, Sullivan
477 S.W.3d 97; 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 835; 2015 WL 5025158 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

McAllister v. State

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Eugene McAllister III (Movant) appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying, ■without an evidentiary hearing, his amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Judgment and Sentence filed pursuant to Rule 29.15 (post-conviction motion).1 We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the judgment of the motion court was not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

. All rule references are to Mo. R. Crim. P. 2013.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.