Missouri Court of Appeals, 2015

Watson v. State

Watson v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided December 8, 2015 · Amburg, Odenwald, Sullivan
477 S.W.3d 688; 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1263; 2015 WL 8227819 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Watson v. State

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Terry Gene Watson appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 29.151 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k); Burston v. State, 343 S.W.3d 691, 693 (Mo.App.E.D. 2011). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

. All rule references are to Mo. R. Crim. P. 2014, unless otherwise noted.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.