Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Missouri Court of Appeals, 2015

Maul v. State

Maul v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided December 15, 2015 · Gaertner, Hess, Quigless
477 S.W.3d 708; 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1295; 2015 WL 8799558 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Maul v. State

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Donald A. Maul appeals from the motion court’s denial of his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 24.0351 without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we find the motion court did not clearly err in denying Mov-ant’s motion without an evidentiary hearing. An extended opinion would have no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Mo. R. Civ. P. 84.16(b) (2015).

. All rule references are to Missouri Supreme Court Rules (2015) unless otherwise indicated.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑