McClendon v. State
McClendon v. State
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Jerome McClendon (“Movant”) appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. Movant was charged as a prior and persis
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the -record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment is affirmed pursuant" to Rule 84.16(b).- .
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.