Missouri Court of Appeals, 2015

De La Hunt v. State

De La Hunt v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided November 17, 2015 · Dowd, III, Mooney
484 S.W.3d 349; 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1172; 2015 WL 7253153 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

De La Hunt v. State

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

■ Matthew De La Hunt appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentia-ry hearing. We find that- the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of íaw are not clearly erroneous.

No jurisprudential, purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our deci*350sion. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.