Missouri Court of Appeals, 2016

Nixon v. State

Nixon v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided February 16, 2016 · Dowd, Hoff, Richter
482 S.W.3d 466; 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 119; 2016 WL 616354 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Nixon v. State

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Raymond J. Nixon appeals from the motion court’s entry of judgment denying, without an evidentiary hearing, his amend*467ed Rule 24.035 Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Judgment and Sentence. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal ‘file, and the record on appeal and find the claim of error' to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting1 the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential or precedential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.