Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Missouri Court of Appeals, 2016

Allen v. State

Allen v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided March 1, 2016 · Dowd, III, Mooney
482 S.W.3d 824; 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 184; 2016 WL 796704 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Counsel

■ Lisa M. Stroup, Missouri Public Defender Office, 1010 Market St., Ste. 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, for Appellant., Chris Kbster, Attorney General, Robert Jefferson Bartholomew, Jr., Asst." Atty. Gen., P.O. Box 899, Jefferson "City, MO 65102, for Respondent.

Allen v. State

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Nathan Allen appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous.

*825No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.