Missouri Court of Appeals, 2016

State v. Medina-Laureano

State v. Medina-Laureano
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided April 12, 2016 · Lisa, Odenwald, Sullivan
485 S.W.3d 826; 2016 WL 1469979; 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 341 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

State v. Medina-Laureano

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Gaudencio Medina-Laureano appeals from the trial court’s judgment entered upon a jury verdict convicting him of second-degree assault and sentencing him to a year in prison. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court did not *827clearly abuse its broad discretion in excluding certain testimony. State v. Chaney, 967 S.W.2d 47, 55 (Mo.banc 1998). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).

i

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.