ORDER

Joseph Murchison appeals the judgment denying his motion for post-conviction'relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court’s judgment is not clearly erroneous. ■

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorán-dum setting forth the reasons for our deci- . sion. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84;16(b).