Missouri Court of Appeals, 2016

Thompson v. State

Thompson v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided May 3, 2016 · Lisa, Odenwald, Sullivan
495 S.W.3d 776; 2016 WL 2338677; 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 434 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Thompson v. State

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Devarick Thompson (“Movant”) appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 post-conviction relief motion after an evidentia-ry hearing. We affirm.

The judgment of the trial court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the *777reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). ■

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.