ORDER

David Mrozak appeals his conviction following a jury trial for attempted entiee*819ment of a child and sentence of ten years imprisonment. In his sole point on appeal, he contends that the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction because the State failed to prove lack of entrapment beyond a reasonable doubt. Because a published opinion would have no prece-dential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

The conviction is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).