Missouri Court of Appeals, 2016

Rodgers v. Fife

Rodgers v. Fife
Missouri Court of Appeals · Decided April 19, 2016 · Dowd, Hoff, Richter, Roy
500 S.W.3d 846; 2016 WL 1578888; 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 372 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Rodgers v. Fife

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Reginald Rogers appeals from the dismissal of his declaratory judgment action, in which he sought a court order reinstating 184 days of credit toward his criminal sentence. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the .claim of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential or precedential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties Setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.